Louisiana HR compliance updates

Louisiana passed two new laws that affect employers in that state:

Wage and occupational information reporting

On June 29, 2021, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards signed into law HB 459/Act. No 474 relative to the reporting and sharing of occupational and employment information. The Act is effective on August 1, 2021, but permits employers subject to §1531.1 of Title 23 (electronic filing and wage reports) who are already reporting occupational information on a form promulgated by the administrator to continue to do so until January 1, 2023.

Effective January 1, 2023, employers subject to §1531.1 will also be required to report occupational information along with their employer contribution and wage reports. Employers must include the SOC (Standard Occupational Classification) Systems codes or job title for each employee it records and reports to the Louisiana Workforce Commission. Employers will not be penalized, however, for failing to report, or failing to timely report, an employee’s occupational code or job title or their hourly rate of pay. Employers are required to maintain records of each employee’s wages which shall also be reported quarterly to the administrator, along with the information already required to be maintained and reported under current law including the street address of each establishment, branch, outlet, or office of such employer; the nature of the operation; the number of persons employed; and the wages paid at each establishment, branch, outlet, or office.

Background checks in hiring

On June 16, 2021, Louisiana Governor John Bel Edwards signed into law HB 707/ Act No. 406 which affects how businesses may use background checks in hiring decisions. For employers who utilize background checks as part of their hiring process, Act. No. 406 prohibits them from considering an arrest record or criminal charge not resulting in conviction revealed in the course of the background investigation in the hiring decision. When considering an applicant’s criminal history, an employer is required to make an individual assessment of whether the applicant’s criminal record has a “direct and adverse relationship with the specific duties of the job” which justifies a refusal to hire. The employer must consider the following criteria in making this individual assessment:

  1. The nature and gravity of the offense or conduct;
  2. The time that has elapsed since the offense, conduct, or conviction; and
  3. The nature of the job sought.

An applicant may request, and if so, an employer shall make available any background check information used during the hiring process.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Hawaii “disability subminimum wage” repealed

On June 16, 2021, Governor David Ige signed legislation, effective immediately, repealing the state’s “disability subminimum wage,” which permitted employers to pay employees with disabilities a wage below the state minimum wage. In support of repeal, the Hawaii legislature cited the Arizona Advisory Committee on the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights findings which reported that the minimum wage exemption no longer served its original purpose in providing a training opportunity towards competitive employment for workers with disabilities, but achieved stagnation in workshops and was a discriminatory practice against workers with disabilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Nevada minimum wage update

Effective July 1, 2021, the minimum wage rate in Nevada is $8.75 per hour if the employee is offered qualifying health benefits (lower tier) and $9.75 per hour if the employee is not offered qualifying health benefits (higher tier).

Nevada’s minimum wage will continue to increase annually on July 1 through 2024, until it eventually reaches $11.00 per hour if the employee is offered qualifying health benefits and $12.00 per hour if the employee is not offered qualifying health benefits.

Employees in Nevada that earn more than one and one-half times the minimum wage for both tiers of employees are eligible for overtime pay at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week.

Employees in Nevada that earn less than one and one-half times the minimum wage for both tiers of employees are entitled to overtime pay at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for hours worked in excess of 40 hours per week, plus overtime pay at one and one-half times their regular rate for working more than 8 hours in a 24-hour period.

For more information, please see the state of Nevada minimum wage bulletin here >

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Oregon minimum wage update

Effective July 1, 2021, Oregon’s standard minimum wage is $12.75 per hour; Portland metro area is $14.00 per hour; and non-urban counties is $12.00 per hour.

Oregon’s minimum wage will continue to increase annually on July 1 through 2022.

Effective July 1, 2023, the state standard minimum wage rate will be indexed to inflation based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Thereafter, the rates for the Portland metro area and for non-urban counties will be the standard rate plus $1.25 per hour, and the standard minimum wage rate minus $1.00, respectively.

Oregon does not provide for a training wage, nor does it permit employers to utilize a tip credit.

For more information, please click here >

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Washington, D.C. minimum wage update

Effective July 1, 2021, the minimum wage rate in Washington, D.C. will increase from $15.00 per hour to $15.20 per hour for all workers (regardless of employer size). The minimum base wage for tipped employees will increase from $5.00 per hour to $5.05 per hour.

2021 is the first year that Washington, D.C.’s minimum wage and minimum base wage for tipped employees is tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Both wage rates will continue to increase annually in proportion to increases in the CPI.

For more information, please see the District of Columbia Minimum Wage Poster (including exceptions to the minimum wage) and also the D.C. Department of Employment Services Wage and Hour Public Notice.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

New York minimum wage for fast food workers

Effective July 1, 2021, all fast food workers in New York state must make at least $15.00 per hour. This fact sheet provides additional information about this new minimum wage >

For more information on the definition of a fast food establishment and what is considered a chain, please see the Hospitality Industry Regulations available at this link >

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

California OSHA updates emergency regulations

The California Occupational Safety and Health Standards (CAL-OSHA) Board adopted revised COVID-19 Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS), effective June 17, 2021.

Please see an FAQ regarding the key revisions linked here >

The revised ETS reflect updated masking and social distancing protocols and are intended to “reflect the availability of vaccinations to limit workplace transmission, to revise requirements in light of updated Centers for Disease Control and California Department of Public Health (CDPH) face covering guidance, and to provide options for employers to make a safe transition from physical distancing and face covering mandates to more normal operations”.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

New Mexico compliance updates

New Mexico has recently passed several laws that affect employers, detailed below.

Lower Minimum Wage for Minors Eliminated

Beginning June 18, 2021, employers will no longer be able to pay minors less than the regular state minimum wage.

Hairstyles Become a Protected Characteristic

The state’s human rights law has been amended so that the employment protections for race now specifically include traits historically associated with race, such as hair texture, length of hair, protective hairstyles (e.g., braids, locs, cornrows, afros), and cultural or religious headdresses (e.g., hijabs, head wraps). This law applies to all employers with four or more employees.

Employers should modify any dress or appearance policies as needed and ensure that managers and those involved in the hiring process are aware of these protections.

Sick Leave Coming July 2022

The state has adopted a sick leave law, applicable to employers of all sizes, that will entitle employees to earn one hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours worked and use up to 64 hours per year. Employee accrual and use of sick leave will begin July 1, 2022. Additional details can be found in our prior post here >>

Cannabis Legalized for Recreational Use

While the state has legalized the recreational use of cannabis (marijuana), the new law doesn’t create any new protections for employees. Although the recreational cannabis law says that employers can keep their written zero tolerance policies, employers should be aware that the state has protections for off-duty medical use of cannabis (with some exceptions).

It’s also worth remembering that drug testing for cannabis doesn’t indicate whether an employee is currently high or when the drug was last used. The test detects the presence of the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis called THC, which can stay in a person’s body for weeks. Random or pre-screening drug testing may screen out qualified applicants or lead you to terminate high-performers (no pun intended) for off-duty use. A common alternative is to limit testing for cannabis to safety-sensitive positions or when there is evidence that an employee is actually high on the job.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Reminder: Massachusetts PFML regarding “care for family member” available July 1

State paid family and medical leave (PFML) laws provide for paid leave from work for eligible employees based on certain qualifying life events, such as the birth or adoption of a child, to care for oneself or a family member who is experiencing a serious medical condition, or to care for a family member injured while on active duty in the military, among others. Employees receive a weekly benefit which represents a portion of their regular compensation based upon a state created formula.

Most Massachusetts PFML benefits became payable January 1, 2021. However, benefits payable for a qualifying event relating to care for a family member become available July 1, 2021.

The Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave hosted informational webinars for employers to help answer questions and review responsibilities and requirements. You can access a recording of that webinar here >>

We’ve compiled a review of Massachusetts’ Paid Family and Medical Leave to ensure you’re aware of key upcoming dates and the requirements to ensure your compliance. You can read that here >

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Massachusetts COVID-19 emergency sick leave now in effect

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts has updated its website to include several frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding the new COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave. Please click here to view that information >

The employee notice which is required to be posted by all employers in accordance with the Act is now available here >

The poster format for the employee notice is available here >

On May 28, 2021, Governor Baker signed An Act Providing for Massachusetts COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave implementing new emergency paid sick leave requirements for employers effective Friday, May 28, 2021* through Thursday, September 30, 2021 (or exhaustion of the COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave Fund, whichever first occurs). *This date was clarified by the new FAQs released by the Commonwealth this week.

Importantly, any paid sick leave taken prior to May 28, 2021 does not satisfy the state mandate, and is not eligible for reimbursement under this program.

The Act requires Massachusetts employers to provide up to forty (40) hours of emergency paid sick leave (EPSL) for employees due to a COVID-19 related reason, with employers permitted to apply for reimbursement for eligible paid leave from the newly created COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave Fund. (See exceptions to reimbursement below).

The Act is applicable to all public and private employers in the Commonwealth, so employers will need to act quickly to review and revise their existing leave policies in order to be ready to implement this requirement.

For multi-state employers or Massachusetts employers who have MA and out-of-state employees, the law will apply only to those employees whose “primary place of employment is in the Commonwealth”. See Q#6 under Eligibility.

Employers should carefully review the preliminary Employer Guidance and FAQs on the Commonwealth website to ensure compliance. Additional guidance and information will be forthcoming including more information on how to apply for reimbursement provided under the Act.

What Employers Need to Know

Effective Friday, May 28, 2021, all public and private employers in the Commonwealth will be required to provide up to forty (40) hours of EPSL to their employees who are unable to work due to any of the following COVID-19 related reasons:


Employee medical reasons:

  • The employee has been diagnosed with COVID-19 and is required to self-isolate
  • The employee needs to seek a medical diagnosis, care, or treatment for COVID-19 symptoms
  • The employee needs to get or recover from a COVID-19 immunization


Employee’s Family Member medical reasons:

  • The employee needs to care for a family member defined as “the spouse, domestic partner, child, parent or parent of a spouse or domestic partner of the employee, a person who stood in loco parentis to the employee when such employee was a minor child or a grandchild, grandparent or sibling of the employee provided, however, that for the purposes of this definition, ‘person who stood in loco parentis’ shall not include a person with whom the employee has no personal relationship” who:
  • Has been diagnosed with COVID-19 and must self-isolate; or
  • Needs to seek a medical diagnosis, care, or treatment for COVID-19 symptoms


Quarantine Order:

  • The employee is subject to a quarantine order or similar determination issued by a: local, state, or public official; health authority having jurisdiction; the employee’s employer; or health care provider
  • The employee must care for a family member who is subject to a quarantine order or similar determination issued by a: local, state or public official; health authority having jurisdiction; the family’s member employer; or health care provider


Inability to Telework
:

  • The employee has been diagnosed with COVID-19 and is unable to telework due to COVID-19 symptoms.

Interactions with other paid leave or other sick leave policies

Generally, employers may not require employees to use other types of existing paid leave before taking EPSL under this program, nor require employees to find their own coverage during their absence.

Employers who have a COVID-19 sick leave policy in place who make available an amount of COVID-19 sick leave sufficient to meet the requirements of the Act and which permits employees to exercise such leave for the same purposes and under the same conditions as the Act, are not required to provide additional EPSL under the Act. This includes employers who have voluntarily continued to offer paid sick leave under the FFCRA and its extensions. See Q #4 under Leave Detail. The sick leave provided under the federal and state programs during the applicable period would run concurrently.

-> Per the FAQs: For an employee who took leave prior to May 28, 2021 under a federal program, that employee would still be entitled to up to 40 hours of MA EPSL for a COVID-19 qualifying reason for the period of May 28, 2021 through September 30, 2021 (or exhaustion of the Fund).

Notice requirement

The Notice for the Act must be conspicuously posted in the physical location where employees work. While the Act states that “Employers shall post this notice in a conspicuous location . . . and shall provide a copy to their employees”, the recently released FAQs state that posting alone is sufficient for notice purposes. If there is no physical workspace, or an employee teleworks, then notice must be effectuated through electronic communication or a conspicuous posting in a web-based platform. Employers may use either the poster or notice format for posting purposes.

The employee notice is now available here >

The poster format is available here

Requests for leave and documentation requirements

Employees must submit their requests for EPSL in writing in order for an employer to be eligible for reimbursement. A standard request form will be released by the Commonwealth for employees to use. Alternatively, employers can develop and use a form of their own creation.

The written request from the employee must include the following:

  • Employee name;
  • Date(s) of leave requested;
  • Statement of reason for leave with written support. If the leave is related to a quarantine order or advice to self-quarantine, the written support must include: Name of the governmental entity ordering or health care provider advising quarantine, or Name and relationship to employee if family member is the individual subject to the order/advice
  • Statement that the employee is unable to work or telework due to a COVID-19 related reason

*The Commonwealth has advised as follows relative to medical documentation required in support of a request for EPSL.

See Q#4 under Documentation and reimbursement inserted below:

Q4. Is an employer permitted to request medical documentation for the categories of leave related to an employee or family member’s diagnosis or treatment for COVID-19? And if so, are there limitations? Is written support required in order to access reimbursement?

“Yes; written medical documentation must be requested of an employee in order for an employer to claim state reimbursement. There are no express limitations on the medical documentation an employer may collect; however, employers must treat health information regarding an employee or employee’s family member as confidential medical records in accordance with applicable state and federal law, and must not disclose such information to any third parties without the employee’s express permission.”

Per the FAQs, employers are also required to obtain documentation of proof of immunization if they intend to seek reimbursement from the Fund for EPSL granted for the purposes of obtaining or recovering from illness or injury related to a COVID-19 vaccine.


Employers should collect and retain the following information for the purposes of substantiating reimbursement requests:

  • Employee’s SSN or TIN;
  • Employer ID number for the position from which the employee took leave;
  • Hours of leave and wages paid during the leave that are NOT eligible for federal tax credits or payable under any other governmental program or law;
  • Benefits applicable to the employee taking the leave;
  • Number of hours of the employee’s regular or variable schedule.

Employers may not retaliate against or interfere with an employee’s use of EPSL. Employers are required to provide the same employment benefits to an employee during their period of leave consistent with the terms of their employment including, but not limited to, group life insurance, health insurance, disability insurance, sick leave, annual or vacation leave, educational benefits and pensions.

Amount of leave and employer reimbursement

Employees who work forty (40) or more hours per week are entitled to up to forty (40) hours of EPSL.

  • For employees who regularly work less than forty (40) hours per week or who work variable schedules, then an average number of hours per week based on such schedules must be provided. Employers should consult the preliminary Employer Guidance from the Commonwealth for how these leave amounts are determined.
  • Employees may take leave intermittently and in as little as hour increments.

Employers are required to pay an employee’s full rate of pay up to a cap of $850.00, including benefits. For employees whose regular rate of pay exceeds this cap, they may use other paid time off to supplement this benefit and receive their full rate of pay during such leave.

Employers will be permitted to apply for reimbursement for all qualifying EPSL (up to the cap of $850.00 per employee) from the newly established COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave Fund. See additional information and exceptions regarding reimbursement under the Interaction with Federal Programs section below.

The Commonwealth will be releasing information on the reimbursement process including the application form in the coming weeks. However, in the interim, employers should continue to collect and retain the documentation required to substantiate employee requests for reimbursement for EPSL as discussed above. See Q#1 under Documentation and Reimbursement.

Interaction with federal programs

The state mandate runs from May 28, 2021 through September 30, 2021 (or exhaustion of the COVID-19 Emergency Paid Sick Leave Fund, whichever first occurs).

Any paid sick leave provided under a federal program prior to May 28, 2021, is not credited towards the MA EPSL employer mandate nor is it eligible for reimbursement.

Employers who are eligible to claim the tax credits for qualified sick leave wages under the FFCRA and its extensions (CAA and ARP) are not eligible to seek reimbursement for paid sick leave under the MA EPSL program.

The federal credits are primary and employers must ATTEST that they are ineligible for federal tax credits for any costs for which they are seeking reimbursement from the Commonwealth.

Ineligible” is explained by the FAQs as follows:

  1. “An employer may be ineligible for the federal tax credits because the employer is categorically disqualified.” This likely refers to employers who have over 500 employees and are therefore not covered under the FFCRA and its extensions.
  2. “The parameters of the leave program the employer offers do not meet federal requirements.” This likely refers to:
    – Employers who have not voluntarily continued federal paid sick leave since expiration of the federal mandate and who will not or cannot undertake the requirements of those programs relative to the MA EPSL program.
    – Employers who have already exhausted all federal credits relative to qualified sick leave wages paid, but are still required to provide additional EPSL under the Act.

See recently added questions under “Interactions with Federal and Non-Federal Programs” for more information.

For those employers who are eligible for reimbursement, where the program runs until September 30, 2021 or exhaustion of the Fund, whichever occurs first, employers should timely seek reimbursement of eligible EPSL to ensure they receive reimbursement.

Information regarding the reimbursement process will be forthcoming from the Commonwealth.

Additional resources

Employers should monitor the COVID-19 Temporary Emergency Paid Sick Leave program website for additional resources and information as it is released.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Nevada requires paid COVID-19 vaccination leave

Effective June 9, 2021 employers that have 50 or more employees in Nevada are required to provide employees with paid leave to get vaccinated for COVID-19. Employees are entitled to take paid COVID vaccination leave through December 31, 2023. You don’t have to provide paid COVID vaccination leave if you are in your first two years of operation or if you offer employees onsite COVID vaccination during work.

Employees are entitled to up to 2 hours of paid leave per shot. This leave is in addition to earned paid leave that became mandatory on January 1 of this year. You can require employees to provide up to 12 hours of notice before taking paid COVID vaccination leave.

Two other requirements to note: You must keep records regarding employees’ use of this leave for at least one year. In addition, you will need to display a poster once the Nevada Labor Commissioner creates it.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

EEOC issues updated COVID-19 technical assistance

On May 28, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) posted updated and expanded technical assistance related to COVID-19, addressing questions arising under the federal equal employment opportunity (EEO) laws. The EEOC also posted a new resource for job applicants and employees, explaining how federal employment discrimination laws protect workers during the pandemic. These publications are provided to help employees and employers understand their rights and responsibilities at work during this time.

The expanded technical assistance provides new information about how the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) apply when an employer offers incentives for employees to provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination when an employee gets a vaccine in the community or from the employer or its agent. The technical assistance answers COVID-19 questions only from the perspective of the EEO laws. Other federal, state, and local laws come into play regarding the COVID-19 pandemic for employers and employees.

“The updated technical assistance released today addresses frequently asked questions concerning vaccinations in the employment context,” said EEOC Chair Charlotte A. Burrows. “The EEOC will continue to clarify and update our COVID-19 technical assistance to ensure that we are providing the public with clear, easy to understand, and helpful information. We will continue to address the issues that were raised at the Commission’s recent hearing on the civil rights impact of COVID-19.”

The key updates to the technical assistance are summarized below:

  • Federal EEO laws do not prevent an employer from requiring all employees physically entering the workplace to be vaccinated for COVID-19, so long as employers comply with the reasonable accommodation provisions of the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other EEO considerations. Other laws, not in EEOC’s jurisdiction, may place additional restrictions on employers. From an EEO perspective, employers should keep in mind that because some individuals or demographic groups may face greater barriers to receiving a COVID-19 vaccination than others, some employees may be more likely to be negatively impacted by a vaccination requirement.
  • Federal EEO laws do not prevent or limit employers from offering incentives to employees to voluntarily provide documentation or other confirmation of vaccination obtained from a third party (not the employer) in the community, such as a pharmacy, personal health care provider, or public clinic. If employers choose to obtain vaccination information from their employees, employers must keep vaccination information confidential pursuant to the ADA.
  • Employers that are administering vaccines to their employees may offer incentives for employees to be vaccinated, as long as the incentives are not coercive. Because vaccinations require employees to answer pre-vaccination disability-related screening questions, a very large incentive could make employees feel pressured to disclose protected medical information.
  • Employers may provide employees and their family members with information about COVID-19 vaccines. The technical assistance highlights federal government resources available to those seeking more information about how to get vaccinated.


The new resource for job applicants and employees provides basic information about how federal employment discrimination laws help workers who are being harassed; who need extra protection against getting sick; who are not being allowed to work; or who need a modification of their employer’s COVID-19 safety requirements.

These two publications follow an EEOC hearing on April 28 on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on civil rights in the workplace at which the EEOC heard from a wide range of experts. They were prepared prior to the CDC’s new guidance for fully vaccinated individuals issued on May 13, 2021, and do not specifically address that new guidance. As new developments occur, the EEOC will consider any impact they may have on EEOC’s COVID-19 technical assistance and will provide additional updates and assistance to the public as needed.

SOURCE: US EEOC

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

How to make “work from home” work for your organization

We were all there: businesses worldwide were forced to make a rapid switch from the traditional office setting to going completely remote in a matter of weeks. Luckily, employers and HR leaders can now take a step back and ask themselves: is working from home really what is best for everyone? The answer to that question truly lies in several places: with the leaders of the company, with the culture of the company, and with the individual employees who form the company team. Both employers and employees need flexibility around remote and in-office work as we continue to find out what’s working best from these diverse perspectives.

Communication and socialization

Talking to your colleagues through a zoom meeting is, arguably, nothing like talking with them in person. Do you consider FaceTime with your family members the same as seeing them in person? Probably not, and the same goes for your co-workers. It’s challenging to build relationships and communicate virtually, which can be especially relevant for new employees. Working together in the same space closes that gap. You can hear or see an issue as it unfolds and present a solution to it. Suppose a team member is struggling with a client or overwhelmed with a project. In that case, someone is right there to lend immediate assistance – it is easy to ask for help (or provide it) when the situation is right in front of you.

Being physically present also allows for those informal conversations where you can chat about your weekend, talk about the weather, or even express your current frustrations. Working remotely can leave people feeling like they are living and working in a box (and we thought cubicles could be bad)! While we may have enjoyed this change at first, humans are naturally social creatures, and this lack of socialization can be challenging. You spend a third of your day with the people you work with, and the relationships with these people can easily slip away when you are not seeing each other regularly. So, if you have not seen your colleagues recently – they probably miss you!

However, for some, there can be a little too much chatter around the office. The potentially quieter environment of your own home may be preferred; the interruptions may be fewer, and potential workplace drama may be easier to steer clear of. This is especially true for people who would typically work independently anyway. Sitting in an office alone – immersed in a project or task that involves intense concentration – likely will not feel differently than sitting in your home office absorbed in that same task.

Whether working remotely or in person, employers should exemplify the importance of building relationships, communicating, and working as a team. Employees should be encouraged to collaborate both formally and informally with those in other departments through various means to the benefit of both fellow employees and customers.

Productivity

Employers have generally seen a boost in employee productivity when working from home. A Stanford study found that the average employee increased their productivity by about 13% when doing so. The reasons? Not having to deal with a morning commute allows employees to start work first thing – usually right when they wake up – while avoiding an evening commute might compel employees to use that time to continue their workday. By cutting out a possibly timely commute, employees can save money on gas and wear and tear on vehicles, translating to a more environmentally conscious work week – a win-win for some!

With employees working from home, I often hear that different types of work can be completed because the distractions are far less. There may be less instances of colleagues popping over for a chat (on the flip side, there may be less instances of colleagues popping over to ask for assistance or advice on certain projects). The various distractions we all encounter throughout the day can undoubtedly hamper one’s ability to complete their daily work obligations.

It is important to note, however, that this boost in productivity can come at a cost for both the employee and the employer. For an employee, the lack of clear boundaries between when work starts and ends can create a feeling of the omnipresent job, one where there is no break in sight. This can lead to significant burnout and stress and may even lead to employees feeling undervalued or underrecognized – providing reasons to look for another job. Employers and managers may miss out on the great work their employees are doing and thus fail to provide recognition or potential advancement, further cementing that feeling of being undervalued. The potential disconnect between employees and employers can leave room for misinterpretation of workload and current expectations, leading to frustrations for everyone.

Work-life balance (and other challenges)

Working from the office provides clear distinction of when work begins and ends. Employees more often have a defined schedule (and don’t we all look forward to the end of a long, accomplished workday?) Working from home may not allow for this, as the distinction between work life and home life inevitably blurs. You can get more work done, but at what cost? Many employees report working more hours when they work from home; of course, it’s hard not to check your email when your laptop is down the hall – or even on your kitchen counter – or finish “just one more thing” before logging off for the night.

For some people, there is no defined space for a home office, and many wind up spending the entire day in their bedroom to avoid various distractions and noise. Perhaps some are forced to constantly move their “offices” to avoid other household members who are currently working or attending school from home. Neither of these situations is ideal, and it can be difficult to get work done from home as the distractions are endless. Having no distinct break from kids, pets, or the never-ending to-do list, forms a less than ideal work-life balance. Instead, it can feel more like you work all the time, and squeeze life in when you can.

One significant benefit to working from home that I have heard from many employees is the ability to start and end work according to their own schedules. This is absolutely a great benefit. But, many HR leaders would contend that the dialogue between employers and employees should be open to the idea that work can always be done on an individual’s own schedule (within reason, of course). Employees shouldn’t have to work from home to feel the relief of a flexible schedule; it can be just as easy to have a flexible schedule while working in the office. Leaving your house in the middle of the day for a doctor’s appointment shouldn’t be any different than needing to leave the office in the middle of the day for a doctor’s appointment. If a flexible schedule is acceptable for employees working from home, employers need to also allow employees to have that same flexibility while in the office.

Conclusion

Importantly, heading into the office can help people feel normal again (because the past year and a half has been anything but normal). However, heading into the office only feels normal if other people are there, too. Employers and managers should discuss with their employees what their work week can and should look like, especially given differences in company culture and even within various departments and positions. Remember, communication is key – leaders need to set expectations, develop schedules that work for their teams, and then be clear with feedback and stick to commitments!

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

EEOC announces new deadline for employers to submit employee data

After delaying the opening of the 2019 EEO-1 Component 1 Data Collection on May 8, 2020 in light of the response to COVID-19, the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) announced that 2019 and 2020 EEO-1 Component 1 data collection is now open. The data collected includes information like race, gender, and ethnicity.

The deadline for submitting 2019 and 2020 EEO-1 Component 1 data will be Monday, July 19, 2021. The EEOC is also extending the data collection period for 2021 from 10 weeks to 12 weeks to provide employers additional time to file.

The EEO-1 Component 1 collects workforce data from employers with 100 or more employees (and federal contractors with 50 or more employees). The EEOC began formally notifying EEO-1 filers via email March 29, 2021. The data collection period is now open.

EEO filers can visit https://EEOCdata.org for more information regarding updates on the data collection. When the collection opens, resources to assist filers with their submissions will be available online at https://EEOCdata.org. The EEOC Filer Support Team is available to respond to filer inquiries and to provide additional filling assistance.

Please visit the EEOC site for additional information >>

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

Vaccine incentive programs: employer considerations

As greater swaths of the population become eligible for vaccination over the coming months, employers who require an in-person workforce are considering vaccines as a way to get their employees back to work safely and their struggling businesses back on track.

For employers wary of implementing a vaccine mandate (especially where current EEOC guidance on employer mandates is fuzzy at best), some are hoping to achieve widespread vaccination of their employees through vaccine incentive programs. These programs provide employees with various benefits in exchange for vaccination including stipends and additional paid time off. However, there are a number of considerations employers should be aware of regarding such programs.

UPDATE: On May 28, 2021, the US EEOC issued updated guidance that addressed vaccine incentive programs. Read more >>

Vaccine incentives

In January 2021, the EEOC issued proposed regulations concerning wellness programs (which would include vaccine incentive programs) however, such regulations were withdrawn under the Biden Administration’s regulatory freeze. While the proposed regulations are no longer available on the EEOC website for review, a January 7, 2021 press release announcing the proposed rule-making states that generally “employers may offer no more than a de minimus incentive to encourage participation in wellness programs.” In the absence of current and controlling guidance however, employers have been left to their own devices in structuring and implementing vaccine incentive programs for their workforces.

Examples of vaccine programs offered by some employers include:

Kroger: $100.00 payment to all associates who receive the full manufacturer-recommended doses of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Instacart: $25.00 Vaccine Support Stipend to offset any loss of wages incurred during the time it takes for an employee to be vaccinated.

Amtrak: Two hours of straight-time pay with proof of vaccination plus excused absences from work to obtain the vaccine.

ALDI: two hours of pay for each dose of the vaccine.

Chobani: up to six hours of paid time (3 hours for each dose) for employees to become vaccinated.

Dollar General: one time payment equivalent to four hours of regular pay upon vaccination.

Employers should tread carefully

Employers should tread carefully, however, as these incentive-based vaccination programs may run afoul of federal anti-discrimination laws such as the ADA and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.

If a cash incentive for vaccination is offered, for example, to all employees but several employees are unable to be vaccinated due to underlying medical conditions, there is a potential discrimination issue based upon disability under the ADA.

Additionally, while employers offering cash bonuses and other benefits may feel as though they are being generous to their employees, employers must be especially careful in structuring the incentives so that the benefit bestowed upon the employee is not so great as to call into question the voluntariness of the employee’s decision to vaccinate. In other words, if an incentive is too appealing where the employee would be hard-pressed to decline, then that could be construed as a form of financial coercion.

On April 15, 2021, in response to an inquiry from various employer organizations regarding “the extent to which employers may offer employees incentives to vaccinate without running afoul of the Americans with Disabilities Act [ADA] and other laws enforced by the EEOC,” the EEOC stated that “agency expects to update its technical assistance about COVID-19 to address these issues, among others, and that work is ongoing.” Employers should continue to monitor the EEOC website for that guidance when it becomes available.

Employers must also be vigilant in monitoring state and local guidance regarding employer mandates of the COVID vaccine. For example, the state of Utah has passed legislation prohibiting governmental employers from making COVID vaccination a condition of employment. This prohibition does not apply to private employers.

RELATED: Employers mandating vaccines – what you need to know >>

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

California supplemental paid sick leave

California has passed a Supplemental Paid Sick Leave law (SPSL) that provides up to 80 hours of COVID-related sick leave for employees in both the public and private sector. The law applies to all California employees who work for employers with more than 25 employees, regardless of location, and covers leaves taken between January 1, 2021 and September 30, 2021. The law took effect immediately on March 19, but had a 10-day grace period. Employers will need to begin granting SPSL, as well as responding to requests for retroactive SPSL pay, on March 29, 2021.

The Department of Industrial Relations has released FAQs that we strongly encourage California employers to review as soon as possible.

Reasons for leave

An employee is entitled to SPSL if they are unable to work or telework for any of the following reasons:

  • Caring for Themselves: The covered employee is subject to a quarantine or isolation period related to COVID-19 by an order or guidelines of the California Department of Public Health, the CDC, or a local health officer with jurisdiction over the workplace, or has been advised by a healthcare provider to quarantine, or is experiencing COVID-19 symptoms and seeking a medical diagnosis.
  • Caring for a Family Member: The covered employee is caring for a family member who is subject to a COVID-19 quarantine or isolation period or has been advised by a healthcare provider to quarantine due to COVID-19, or is caring for a child whose school or place of care is closed or unavailable due to COVID-19 on the premises.
  • Vaccine-Related: The covered employee is attending a vaccine appointment or cannot work or telework due to vaccine-related symptoms.

Amount of leave

Employees are generally entitled to the following leave amounts:

  • Employees who are considered full-time, or who work 40 or more hours per week in the two weeks prior to taking leave, get up to 80 hours.
  • Part-time employees with a regular weekly schedule get the number of hours they are normally scheduled to work over two weeks.
  • Part-time employees with variable schedules get 14 times the average number of hours worked per day over the six months immediately before taking SPSL, or over their entire period of employment if they have worked for fewer than six months.

Rate of pay

When taking SPSL, non-exempt employees must be paid the highest of the following:

  • Their regular rate of pay for the workweek in which leave is taken
  • The state minimum wage
  • Local minimum wage
  • Average hourly pay for preceding 90 days (not including overtime pay)

Exempt employees must be paid the same rate of pay they would receive for other paid leave time.

Payout for all employees is capped at $511 per day and $5,110 in total for SPSL.

Offsetting an employee’s SPSL entitlement

The new SPSL allows for employers to “receive a credit” toward the hours owed to an employee if they provide or provided the same employee with another form of COVID-specific leave after January 1, 2021. The leave provided must have been used for a covered reason under the SPSL law.

For instance, if an employer voluntarily provided federal emergency paid sick leave (EPSL) between January 1 and March 28, 2021, they could subtract the number of hours of federal EPSL an employee took from their SPSL entitlement. Employers can do the same thing with local COVID-specific sick leave entitlements.

The credit does not apply for regular California state sick leave (because it is not COVID-specific) and it does not apply if an employee was allowed or required to use PTO, vacation, or other non-COVID leave to cover their hours.

Retroactive pay for leaves between January 1 and March 28

If a covered employee took leave between January 1, 2021 and March 28, 2021, for one of the qualifying reasons under the new SPSL, but was not paid for this leave in the amount required under this law, they have the right to ask their employer for a retroactive payment equal to the amount required.

After the employee makes the oral or written request, the employer will have until the payday for the next full pay period to pay the retroactive SPSL.

Documentation from employees

Employees are entitled to take SPSL immediately upon oral or written request and may not be required to provide medical certification or proof of their need for leave. There is an exception if the employer has a reasonable believe (read: objective evidence) that the employee is using leave for an invalid reason.

Mandatory notice

Employers must post this mandatory workplace poster in a conspicuous location in the workplace. Employers whose workforces are remote, or partly remote, should ensure that those employees see the poster, either by sending it via email or posting it online.

Employers must also notify employees of their available SPSL balance on itemized wage statements or on a separate writing at the time wages are paid. The balance must be listed separately from the regular paid sick leave balance.

Additional information

It is not entirely clear how this new leave interacts with other leaves, especially federal EPSL. Given that the leaves provided by the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) were intended to be strictly in addition to other leaves, and under the original FFCRA rules employees could not be required to use their FFCRA leave when other leave was available, there is not a perfectly straight line between offering SPSL and receiving a tax credit, even though it seems that this is what the CA Legislature was trying to accomplish.

We will continue to monitor additional guidance from the IRS or DOL as that becomes available, which should provide clarity around many FFCRA questions.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

HR Support Center

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

California payroll reporting: pay data due by March 31

  • California pay data reporting due by March 31, 2021.
  • BACKGROUND: This new requirement – which became effective January 1, 2021 – imposes new pay reporting requirements on California employers. On or before March 31, 2021 and on or before March 31 of each year thereafter, California employers who are already required to file an Employment Information Report (EEO-1) under federal law must report required pay data including pay and hours data relative to race, ethnicity and gender to California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (CDFEH).
  • CDFEH has launched a web page as well as activated the reporting portal, which can be accessed here. In addition, that department has published a series of FAQs which answer important questions like:
    – Which employers are subject to the filing requirement.
    – How employees in and out of California are treated for purposes of determining filing jurisdiction.
    – Which employees must and may be included in these filings.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

New York vaccination paid leave

Employers in New York are now required to provide up to four hours of paid leave in order to obtain COVID-19 vaccinations.

The governor signed the bill – New York Labor Law Section 197-c – on March 12, 2021, and it is effective immediately. The bill requires that private employers provide “a sufficient period of time, not to exceed four hours per vaccine injection” for employees to receive COVID-19 vaccinations, unless the employer or any applicable collective bargaining agreement provides for more paid leave.

It’s important to note the language of the bill, i.e. “per vaccine injection,” denotes that the employee would actually be entitled to up to eight hours of paid leave for those COVID-19 vaccines that require two separate vaccinations.

Employees are to be compensated at their regular rate of pay. The four hours of vaccination paid leave cannot be deducted from any other sick leave the employee is entitled to receive (including leave derived from other COVID-19 legislation or orders).

The New York DOL released an FAQ on March 21 that answered a number of outstanding questions, including clarifying that employers may indeed require proof of vaccination (while taking into account applicable privacy considerations); employers can require advanced notice of vaccination leave; and that employers must only provide paid leave for the “sufficient period of time” in which an employee is absent from work (not exceeding four hours).

New York employers should review the full FAQ document which can be accessed here >>

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

American Rescue Plan Act: COBRA subsidies

The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA), signed into law March 11, 2021, provides a 100% subsidy of premiums for employer sponsored group health insurance continued under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1986 (COBRA) and similar state continuation of coverage (mini-COBRA) programs.

ARPA subsidies cover the full cost of COBRA or mini-COBRA premiums from April 1, 2021, through Sept. 30, 2021, for employees (and their qualifying family members), if the employee lost or loses group health insurance due to an involuntary job loss or reduction in work hours. The subsidy applies to people who are still within their original COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period, for the length of that coverage period, even if they declined or dropped COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage earlier.

The subsidy does not apply to:

  • Individuals whose job loss was voluntary or the result of gross misconduct; or
  • Individuals who are eligible for another group health plan or Medicare.

The subsidies are funded through a payroll tax credit. Employers are required to provide new notices about the subsidy to employees. The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) will issue model notices for this purpose.

Employers should familiarize themselves with the provisions of ARPA and watch for agency guidance on its implementation. Checkwriters will continue to monitor expected guidance and update our COBRA clients as more information becomes available. At this time, our Development Team is working to implement these changes in our system.

Overview

COBRA requires group health plans to allow covered employees and their dependents to continue their group health plan coverage when it would be lost due to specific events, such as a termination of employment or reduction in working hours. Individuals are usually allowed to continue their COBRA coverage for 18 months, although some similar state mini-COBRA laws mandate a longer coverage period.

Under COBRA, group health plans may require those covered to pay 102% of the premium for their continuing health insurance, leading many eligible individuals to decline coverage. The ARPA subsidy covers the full cost of COBRA or mini-COBRA premiums from April 1 – September 30, 2021, for “assistance-eligible individuals.”

Covered Plans

The COBRA subsidy in ARPA applies to group health plans subject to federal COBRA or to a state mini-COBRA program. Plans subject to federal COBRA are plans maintained by employers with 20 or more employees on more than 50% of the business days in the previous calendar year. Small-employer plans, small governmental plans, and church plans are not subject to federal COBRA, but may be subject to a state mini-COBRA law and therefore be covered by ARPA’s COBRA subsidy provisions.

Health flexible spending arrangements under Section 125 cafeteria plans are not covered by the ARPA COBRA subsidy.

Eligible Individuals

Individuals are eligible for the COBRA subsidy if they:

  • Are a qualified beneficiary of the group health plan; and
  • Are eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA continuation coverage because of the covered employee’s involuntary termination (unrelated to gross misconduct) or reduction in hours of employment.

The subsidy is not available for people who voluntarily left their job. It is also unavailable for people who are eligible for Medicare or another group health plan, not including:

  • A plan covering only excepted benefits;
  • A qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangement; or
  • A flexible spending arrangement.

Furthermore, individuals receiving a COBRA subsidy who become eligible for a group health plan or Medicare must inform the health plan for which they are receiving the subsidy of that fact, or face a penalty. The premium subsidy is not counted as gross income.

Extended Election Period

ARPA allows individuals to elect subsidized COBRA if they:

  • Become eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA due to involuntary job termination (not caused by gross misconduct) or reduction in hours between April 1 and September 30, 2021;
  • Previously declined COBRA or mini-COBRA after becoming eligible due to involuntary job termination (not caused by gross misconduct) or reduction in hours, but would still be within their COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period had they elected the coverage at that point; or
  • Previously elected COBRA or mini-COBRA but discontinued the coverage before April 1, 2021.

The election period for subsidized COBRA under ARPA begins on April 1, 2021, and runs until 60 days after the date individuals receive notice from the health plan of the availability of the COBRA subsidy.

Duration of Coverage

COBRA and mini-COBRA coverage under the ARPA election extension starts with the first period of coverage beginning on or after April 1, 2021, and continues through the end of the individual’s COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period. The individual’s COBRA or mini-COBRA coverage period is the period that would have applied had the individual elected the continuation coverage when first eligible following the initial qualifying event. For individuals who previously elected COBRA or mini-COBRA, discontinued it, and are now using the ARPA extended election period to obtain COBRA, the COBRA coverage period is calculated as if they had not dropped the coverage.

Switching Coverage

ARPA contains a provision that—at the employer’s option—allows individuals eligible for the COBRA subsidy and enrolled in the employer’s group health plan to change to different health coverage also offered by the employer. The new coverage cannot have a higher premium than the individual’s previous coverage, and it must be offered to similarly situated active employees. The option does not apply to plans that provide only excepted benefits, to qualified small employer health reimbursement arrangements or to health flexible spending arrangements.

The change must be elected within 90 days of the employee receiving notice of the option.

Notice Requirements

ARPA imposes new COBRA notice requirements on health plans.

General Notice: Plan administrators must provide notification of COBRA benefits under ARPA. The notice must be written in clear and understandable language, and it must inform recipients of the availability of ARPA premium assistance and the option under ARPA to enroll in different coverage (if the employer permits that option).

The notice must be provided to individuals who become eligible for COBRA or mini-COBRA during the period of April 1 – September 30, 2021. In addition, it must be provided by May 31, 2021, to people who have already elected COBRA coverage, and to people subject to the ARPA election extension—that is, people eligible for the subsidy who declined or discontinued COBRA or mini-COBRA before April 1, 2021.

The notification may be included in an amendment to a plan’s existing notices or be given in a separate notice, but it must contain the following information:

  1. The forms necessary for establishing eligibility for premium assistance
  2. The name, address and telephone number necessary to contact the plan administrator and any other person maintaining relevant information in connection with premium assistance
  3. A description of the extended election period under ARPA
  4. A description of the obligation of qualified beneficiaries to notify the plan if they become eligible for another group health plan or Medicare, and the penalty for failure to do so
  5. A prominently displayed description of the right to a subsidized premium and any conditions on entitlement to the subsidized premium
  6. A description of the option of the right to enroll in different coverage (if the employer permits this option)

The DOL is charged with issuing a model general notice by April 10, 2021, for plans to use to meet the general notice requirement.

Notice of Expiration of Subsidy: Plans must also provide individuals eligible for the ARPA subsidy with notice of its expiration. The notice must be written in clear and understandable language, and inform recipients that:

  • The premium assistance will expire soon, prominently identifying the expiration date; and
  • The individual may be eligible for coverage without premium assistance through COBRA continuation or a group health plan.

Plans are not required to issue an expiration notice to individuals whose subsidy is expiring because they became eligible for other group health plan coverage or Medicare.

The notice must be provided during the 45 – 15-day period before the individual’s subsidy expires. The DOL must issue model expiration notices by April 25, 2021.

Tax Credit

The ARPA COBRA subsidy is funded through a tax credit to employers (for self-insured plans and multi-employer plans) and insurance carriers (for fully insured plans). The credit is taken against payroll taxes. It can be advanced (according to forms and instructions to be provided by federal agencies) and is fully refundable. The credits will be provided each quarter in an amount equal to the premiums not paid by assistance-eligible individuals.

Employers should familiarize themselves with the provisions of ARPA and watch for agency guidance on its implementation. Checkwriters will continue to monitor expected guidance and update our COBRA clients as more information becomes available. At this time, our Development Team is working to implement these changes in our system.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

American Rescue Plan Act: Employer highlights

On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was signed into law. In addition to providing a third round of stimulus to individuals, ARPA contains several provisions that are of particular importance to employers. These provisions include extensions and changes to both the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) and Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) Paid Sick and Family Leave Credit, introduces temporary COBRA and ACA subsidies, and increases contribution limits to dependent care FSAs.

The Checkwriters Compliance Team has included summaries of each of these provisions below; however, for full details on ARPA please click here.

Employee Retention Credit (ERC) extended

The Employee Retention Credit (ERC) was created through prior COVID-19 relief legislation (the CARES Act) and was set to expire June 30, 2021. ARPA extends the ERC through December 2021. The credit remains 70% of up to $10,000 in qualified wages per employee per quarter, with a $28,000 maximum credit per employee for 2021. ARPA modifies several components of the ERC:

  • Extends the ERC to new businesses begun after February 15, 2020. These new businesses must have annual receipts of under $1 million; the amount of the credit cannot exceed $50,000 per quarter.
  • Relaxes previous restrictions on “Severely Financially Distressed Employers.” These employers must demonstrate that gross receipts are less than 10% of gross receipts of the corresponding base period. They can then apply the ERC to all wages paid to employees up to the applicable $10,000 per employee per quarter limit.
  • It is also important to note that after June 30, 2021, the credit applies against the employer’s Medicare hospital insurance (HI) taxes rather than Social Security Old Age, Survivor’s and Disability Insurance (OASDI) taxes. The credit remains refundable for employers with insufficient tax liability.

Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) Paid Sick and Family Leave Credit

Prior COVID-19 relief legislation (the FFCRA) created a payroll tax credit for employers to help defray the costs of previously required paid sick leave and paid family leave. ARPA extends these Sick and Family Leave credits through September 30, 2021. While the requirement for covered employers to offer paid FFCRA leave expired last year, that leave is funded by the government up to applicable limits for covered employers that offer it.

The previous 10-day limitation for paid sick leave applies, while the previous wage limit for paid family leave payments is increased from $10,000 per employee to $12,000 per employee.

The Act also adds new reasons employees can take leave (and reasons employers can take the credit):

  • Time awaiting results of a COVID-19 test.
  • Time obtaining a COVID-19 vaccine.
  • Time recovering from the negative health impact of a COVID-19 vaccine.

NOTE: Employers cannot take the credit for payroll costs subject to PPP loan forgiveness.

COBRA subsidies

ARPA includes a 100% COBRA subsidy for qualified employees and dependents who lose coverage because of involuntary termination or reduction in hours. In addition, qualified individuals who had previously not elected COBRA have the option to now elect COBRA, as long as the individual is still within their COBRA maximum period. The subsidy is effective for coverage periods beginning April through September 2021.

Employers are reimbursed through a refundable payroll tax credit; this credit may be advanced by the IRS to the employer (further guidance is expected).

Read our full post on COBRA subsidies under ARPA here >>

NOTE: Employers cannot use same wages as those used for ERC or FFCRA paid sick and family leave credit.

ACA subsidies

ACA premium subsidies are increased through 2022, in effect decreasing the required individual contribution. ARPA provides a 100% subsidy for ACA coverage to those either unemployed or earning up to 150% of the federal poverty level (FPL) for two years (individuals earning below 150% of the FPL must currently pay up to four percent of their income).

ARPA also expands ACA subsidies for people with income over 400% of the FPL who were previously ineligible. Premium costs are now capped at 8.5% of income. Individuals who receive unemployment insurance at any time in 2021 will be able to obtain ACA coverage at no cost.

Dependent Care FSA contribution limits increased

The contribution limit for employer provided dependent-care FSAs (DC-FSAs) is increased from $5,000 to $10,500 (or from $2,500 to $5,250 for married filing separately) for 2021.

For employees to take advantage, employers would need to amend their cafeteria or DC-FSA. These amendments can be retroactive if adopted no later than December 31, 2021.

Read our full post on the contribution increase for DC-FSAs here >>

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

February 26, 2021

Employers mandating vaccines: what you need to know

From the Checkwriters Compliance Team

Employers are looking toward the likely return of more employees over the coming months and year. Can – and should – employers mandate a COVID-19 vaccine as a condition of employment or continued employment? The answer is two-fold: possibly; and no. Employers pondering a mandatory vaccination requirement should consider EEOC and other federal guidance, individual state guidance, and other specific issues such as employer liability and employee morale.

Tread carefully

Employers should tread carefully in considering whether to implement a mandatory vaccination requirement for employees. The limited guidance offered by the EEOC in the form of a Q and A fails to address the question head-on, but suggests the ability of employers to require vaccination under federal law by focusing on the requirements and exceptions employers must consider should they choose to make vaccination mandatory.

However, an important preliminary consideration is that the vaccines currently available for public use have Emergency Use Authorization (“EUA”) only from the FDA as opposed to full FDA vaccine licensure. Vaccines released under EUA status are still in the investigational phase and require that those receiving the vaccine be informed that they have the ability to decline it, perhaps calling a potential employer mandate into question. See a recent article discussing this very issue.

Employee considerations

  • Employers should be mindful that their employees may have sincere reservations about the long-term safety and efficacy of these first vaccines, and that implementing a mandate when potentially other mitigation strategies exist (such as telecommuting, enhanced social distancing and masking, and staggered work schedules) could hurt employee morale.
  • Other considerations include the potential for adverse side effects to the vaccine and employer liability (though worker’s compensation could cover adverse reactions if vaccination was made a requirement for continued employment).
  • Lastly, employers must be mindful of their specific duties and obligations pertaining to accommodation requests on the basis of disability (ADA) and/or sincerely held religious belief (Title VII Civil Rights Act).

For these reasons, we would not suggest mandating the vaccine at this time.

*Additional guidance from the EEOC regarding COVID-19 vaccines and the workplace will be forthcoming, and employers should continue to monitor the EEOC COVID-19 webpage for future updates, as well as to monitor state guidance in their applicable jurisdiction.

Disclaimer: The information contained herein is not intended to be construed as legal advice, nor should it be relied on as such. Employers should closely monitor the rules and regulations specific to their jurisdiction(s) and should seek advice from counsel relative to their rights and responsibilities.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

February 26, 2021

Sante Fe County, City of Santa Fe minimum wage update

  • Effective March 1, 2021, the Sante Fe County, NM minimum wage is $12.32 (previously $12.10 per hour). The Sante Fe County tipped minimum wage is $3.69 per hour (previously $3.62 per hour). Read more here >>
  • Effective March 1, 2021, the city of Sante Fe, NM minimum wage is $12.32 (previously $12.10 per hour). For tipped employees: those who receive more than $100.00 per month in tips or commissions, any tips or commissions received and retained by a worker shall be counted as wages and credited towards satisfaction of the minimum wage. Workers who “customarily receive” more than $100 per month in tips must still receive the minimum hourly wage in the City, so if they aren’t earning enough in tips the employer must pay them enough to make up the difference. Read more here >>

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

February 26, 2021

OSHA issues new COVID-19 guidance

OSHA issued new advisory-only guidance on January 29, 2021 (no new legal requirements or obligations). The recommendations include: Assignment of a workplace coordinator responsible for COVID-19 issues; Identification of where and how workers might be exposed to COVID-19 at work; Consideration of protections for workers at higher risk for severe illness. The full list can be accessed on OSHA’s site >>

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

February 25, 2021

California cities and counties extend/modify leave ordinances

Eight California cities and counties have extended, expanded, and/or modified their emergency leave ordinances:

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Massachusetts minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $13.50 per hour. The minimum base wage or service rate for tipped employees who make more than $20.00 per month in tips will increase to $5.55 per hour effective January 1, 2021.
  • All tips must be retained by the employee or distributed through a valid tip-pool in accordance with state law.
  • Tipped employees must earn at least the state minimum wage of $13.50 per hour between the service rate and tips received. To determine if an employee’s wages meet this requirement, the employer must calculate the difference between the service rate and earned tipsat the end of every shift worked by the employee. Any deficit between the state minimum wage and the service rate plus tips must be made up by the employer.
  • Effective January 1, 2021, premium pay for employees working on Sundays and the following federal holidays will be reduced from 1.3 times regular rate of pay to 1.2 times regular rate of pay:Memorial Day;Juneteenth;Independence Day; andLabor Day.
  • Memorial Day;
  • Juneteenth;
  • Independence Day; and
  • Labor Day.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Maine minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $12.15 per hour.
  • For tipped employees, the state minimum base wage is $6.08 per hour. An employer must notify an employee in advance of its intention to use a tip credit, and must be able to demonstrate that the employee has received at least the state minimum wage when the base wage and actual tips received are combined within the seven day workweek. Should any deficit exist between the state minimum wage and the employee’s base or service wage plus tips, the employer must make up the difference in cash wages.
  • The state minimum salary threshold for employees exempt from overtime pay effective January 1, 2021 is $700.97 per week ($36,450.44 annually). The minimum salary threshold is just one factor in determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime pay under federal and state law.
  • For more information, please visit the Maine Department of Labor website.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Maryland minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $11.75 per hour and is applicable to employers with fifteen (15) or more employees. For employers with fourteen (14) or less employees, the state minimum wage is $11.60 per hour.
  • The minimum base wage or service rate for tipped employees (those who make more than $30.00 per month in tips) is $3.63 per hour, with employers being permitted to utilize a tip credit for tips actually received in order to meet the state minimum wage.
  • Employers who utilize a tip credit must provide employees with a written or electronic wage statement for each pay period showing the hourly rate of pay including paid cash wages plus tips for tip credit hours worked for each workweek of the pay period.
  • Minor employees under the age of eighteen (18) must earn at least 85% of the state minimum wage.
  • Certain classes of employees exempt from Maryland’s minimum wage and overtime laws include:employees who are immediate family members of the employer;
    executive, administrative and professional employees;employees under age sixteen (16) working less than 20 hours per week; andcommissioned employees.
  • employees who are immediate family members of the employer;
    executive, administrative and professional employees;
  • employees under age sixteen (16) working less than 20 hours per week; and
  • commissioned employees.
  • For more information, please visit the Maryland Department of Labor Website.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Ohio minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $8.80 per hour and is applicable to employers with gross annual receipts of more than $323,000.00.
  • Employers with gross annual receipts less than $323,000.00 must pay their employees the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour.
  • Minor employees under the age of sixteen (16) must be paid the federal minimum wage.
  • “Tipped employees” (employees in an occupation in which they regularly and customarily earn in excess of $30.00 per month in tips) may be paid a minimum base wage of $4.40 per hour, so long as the base wage plus tips totals at least the state minimum wage of $8.80 per hour.
  • There are certain classes of employees which are exempt from the state minimum wage requirements including employees of a solely family owned and operated business who are family members of the owner of such business.
  • For more information, please visit the Ohio Department of Commerce website.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Illinois minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $11.00 per hour. Employers with at least four (4) employees are subject to the state minimum wage requirements. Domestic workers are covered by the state minimum wage law, even if the employer only employs one (1) worker.
  • New employees (who do not receive gratuities) may be paid $.50 less per hour for the first ninety (90) days of their employment ($10.50 per hour for 2021). Thereafter, they must be paid the full state minimum wage.
  • For employees who receive gratuities, an employer may pay such employees no less than sixty percent (60%) of the state minimum wage. If a deficit exists between the state minimum wage and the tipped employee’s base wage plus tips, the employer must make up the difference.
  • The state minimum wage laws apply to employees age eighteen (18) or older. Minors above the age of fourteen (14), but who have not attained age eighteen (18) may be paid a minimum wage of $8.50 per hour. Under eighteen (18) employees who work 650 hours or more for an employer during a calendar year must be paid $11.00 per hour for each hour above this threshold.
  • For more information, please see these FAQs located on the Illinois Department of Labor website.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back

January 1, 2021

Colorado minimum wage update

  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage is $12.32 per hour, and is applicable to all employees whether employed on an “hourly, piecework, commission, time, task, or other basis”.
  • Effective January 1, 2021, the state minimum wage for tipped employees is $9.30 per hour. Tipped employees are those engaged in an occupation that regularly receive more than $30.00 per month in tips.
  • For tipped employees, employers may use a maximum tip credit of $3.02 per hour to meet the state 2021 minimum wage of $12.32 per hour. If a deficit exists between the state minimum wage and the employee’s base wage plus tips, the employer must make up the difference.
  • For persons in highly technical computer-based occupations, they must receive at least a minimum hourly wage of $28.38 or the equivalent of the weekly minimum salary for exempt, white collar employees which is $778.85 per week effective January 1, 2021.
  • For more information please visit the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment website.

By Megan Butz
General Counsel, HR Compliance, Checkwriters
Megan joined Checkwriters in 2020 and is responsible for reviewing, revising, and implementing internal policies of the company, advising on human resource, employment, and labor matters, and monitoring and publishing state and federal legal updates to the Checkwriters News and Compliance Center for distribution to thousands of clients around the country. Before joining Checkwriters, Megan served as a judicial law clerk for the justices of the Massachusetts Probate and Family Court performing legal research and writing, followed by private practice in Cape Cod.

Go back